You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Most of the authors of these PRs seem to be unresponsive, with only #2066 showing progress.
I think #2061 would be particularly valuable to merge. As for the other OVH-related PRs, we could either leave them aside or we make an effort to get them finalised without author collaboration.
Nowadays since agentic coding dives into the main stream, I prefer to follow the Commit-Then-Review workflow. That is, no need to wait the PR author for developing, while we can retain any Co-authored-by credit when it is the case.
Activity
micafer commentedon Nov 11, 2026
Most of the authors of these PRs seem to be unresponsive, with only #2066 showing progress.
I think #2061 would be particularly valuable to merge. As for the other OVH-related PRs, we could either leave them aside or we make an effort to get them finalised without author collaboration.
What do you think?
tisonkun commentedon Nov 11, 2026
Agree. Let's go.
Nowadays since agentic coding dives into the main stream, I prefer to follow the Commit-Then-Review workflow. That is, no need to wait the PR author for developing, while we can retain any Co-authored-by credit when it is the case.
https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary#CommitThenReview
PsiACE commentedon Nov 11, 2026
+1, and Commit-Then-Review is a good choice